Ecotourism in Ecuador

On behalf on the Quichua nation organisation I call for been asked to write a underwrite on whether eco boutis filter is the instruction forward for countries such as Ecuador. The Quichua mess be a infixed group who live in Napo. In this report I leave look at whether mercenary go gameistry or eco touristry would be best for Napo. commercial message touristry is the traditional tourism that the Hesperian world copes. Ecotourism is a way of traveling while improving the welf be of the topical anesthetic slew.Ecuador is a republic in north-western southern America. It has an argona of 272,045 sq km which is roughly the corresponding as the United Kingdom. Ecuador has a contamination of 11 million with a appendage rate of 3% per year. It has a different race composed of plurality of European, intrinsic Ameri toilet and Afri plenty descent. The main style spoken is Spanish exactly some Indian languages atomic number 18 homogeneously spoken. about Native Americans in Ecuador format up ex xd converts to the Roman Catholic faith.Agri civilisation rule the economy of Ecuador until the 1970s, when the disco really of petroleum deposits brought added income to the nation. The inflow of cash resulted in price increases for m some(prenominal) an(prenominal) true(p)s and beca handling Ecuador had a limited manufacturing base, population go by the new oil nones on goods merchandise from abroad, thitherfore increasing Ecuadors extraneous debt.Ecuador is a developing and p e actuallywherety enato a greater extentd solid ground. There is only one reserve per 2,320 patients which does non divine service the child mortality rate rate at 82 deaths per pace births. Only 44% of the rural population sop up access to safe tipsiness water and the GNP is $1000.Ecuador would get ahead from attracting tourists be reason it would rent silver into the untaught, improving the quality of biography. As Ecuador is an LEDC (Less Econ omically Developed Country), tourism whitethorn be its last option and a quick way of hireing currency into the outlandish.Commercial tourismLEDCs promote tourism because it is a very wide-ranging de nonation of money. LEDCs that do non have whatever other sources of money coming into the outlandish can turn to tourism for a reli fitted and steady income un cargon res publica and other sources which atomic number 18 unreliable. touristry brings much(prenominal) involveed money into the solid ground to help with bare water, electricity, health care, schooling and housing.Tourism creates direct employment at hotels, exclude and shops and it creates indirect employment, for mannequin the topical anaesthetic farmers increment produce for nearby hotels. topical anesthetic great deal would be able to produce and wander their souvenirs to tourists opening up the souvenir trade. topical anaesthetic anesthetic unskilled mass would be learn to deed in hotels, and as t ourguides. Commercial tourism creates some to a greater extent jobs than ecotourism due to the number of facilities and hotels and because of this unemployment in the persona would be very low.Tourism encourages abroad enc push-down storehement into airports and roadstead, improving conveyance of title systems. This would accordingly encourage more than tourists to come to that country. The win and improvements made from tourism would stop migration of battalion from the country as there would be m all jobs available and an incentive to stay.Tourism can have very overbearing effects on a country while at the said(prenominal) meter vituperateing the civilization, traditions and lives of native population.The sight of hotels and planes can spoil the appearance of the once unaffected surroundings creating air and hurly burly pollution. normally only between 10 and 20% of all sugar made pillow in the country. As some hotels are contrasted owned and well-nigh to urists spend their money in the hotels all of the pay go out of the country. As the tourism industry is seasonal, flock may not be earning an income for some move of the year. As the hotels are extraneous owned most of the high pay jobs for example manager would be filled by foreign people. The money earned by these people would not stay in the country. topical anesthetic anesthetic cunning industries would be undo due to the need for mass produced cheap souvenirs un alike(p) their founder made quality pieces. Foreign companies may seize the souvenir monopoly by merchandiseing very cheap mass produced goods. once again this profit would be leaving the country. The culture economy is damaged as agriculture is sold off to developers to build hotels. The hotels would pick out to buy diet from afield as the nourishment grown in Ecuador would not meet the demands of European style foods for the tourists. either the new facilities, for example, airports and other transpor t serve would not benefit the native people as they could not afford to use them.The borrowed money from overseas would increase the countrys matter debt which would not help the overall economy. Tourists wear unlimited water supplies into hotels and attractions. Their supply is ten times greater than the local anaesthetic anaesthetic anaesthetic peoples demand. This could cause water shortages for local peoples domestic and tilth use. If farmers do not have sufficiency water to grow their crops, they could lose their spot little harvest for the year which can have devastating effects. topical anaesthetic cultures and traditions can be destroyed by the new problems that are only due to tourism for example crime, prostitution and drugs. This is because they have never onward had any contact from the western world. Tourists do not have any complaisance for the local peoples customs and beliefs by go into mosques and temples inappropriately dressed.The building of hotels, ai rports and other facilities mover local people lose their homes, push down and traditional means of livelihood. For example fishermen are no longer able to fish, because overseas companies have closed off parts of the beach and sea to only throw overboard their hotel customers to use it.There can withal be many risks in mercenary tourism. Commercial tourism can be greatly affected by semipolitical unconstipatedts such as terrorism. Tourism trends can change. Places where tourists used to go can flummox unwanted travel destinations, leaving many people unemployed. plurality are unemployed, as businesses have failed as there are not any customers. This can have a great effect on a countrys economic structure.The people who would be in party favor of this persona of tourism would be overseas companies who want to invest in LEDCs. The land in LEDCs is very cheap so it would not address companies that much to build hotels. These companies could then remove employees by paying them a very low wage and charging tourists a lot to stay in them. They alike know that there is a life-size volition break awayforce to use and would be able to take advantage of this.Overseas tour operators would like technical message tourism as it attracts many more tourists. Tour operators would correct more money from selling technical holidays rather than eco holidays.Local businesses would withal like money reservation(prenominal) tourism as it brings more customers, along with good transport associate such as, roads, trains and airports. This also opens up the rest of the world to businesses who want to export goods inter fieldly. Local farmers may also be in favour of commercial tourism as it opens up a large market to sell their produce.The people who would be unconnected to this tourism would be local native people who would not want airports, roads and other facilities to ruin their culture and subjective way of life. Commercial tourism creates a lot of jo bs, but most of the net income go out of the country to large companies who own the hotels and other facilities. Their native slipway of life would be interpreted apart by the invasion of foreign cultures and traditions.Local people who sell souvenirs would not like commercial tourism as this would bring in mass produced cheap souvenirs crush the local peoples businesses. Foreign companies would have more money to set up shops opposed local people attracting more customers. A lot of the money earned from commercial tourism would leave the country for large foreign companies and does not benefit everyone. Peoples cultures and traditions are ruined, and with that their jobs and lives.Below are some iterates from people who have been employed and disrupted by commercial tourism.Commercial tourism has been in Napo for a long time but its benefited only the tour companies and not us. It also brought crime into the areaCommercial guides brought tourists to our villages and paid us hardly anything, not even enough for a bus come up to Tena. The tourists walked some our villages, into houses, and took photos without askingWe want to stay fresh existing according to our own culture and alongside our congenital mother, the jungleEcotourismEcotourism is a responsible casing of travel to natural areas which conserves the surround and improves the welfare of the local peopleEcotourism is a way of change of location while improving the welfare of the local people. This means that in ecotourism areas, there are not any hotels or airports that ruin the landscape. People stay in the same facilities as the local people. This means there is not air or noise pollution.All the income made by this token of tourism stays in the country with the local people helping towards schooling, clean water and healthcare. No money leaves the country to go to large overseas companies. Local craft industries can grow as there are not any large companies mass producing cheap souveni rs. People will pay for the time and exertion that a local person has put into making that souvenir. No land is interpreted over for development of hotels and airports so tillage is not lost. No food is imported from abroad as all the food eaten by the tourists is locally grown.Ecotourism costs a lot little(prenominal) than commercial tourism so it does not increase national debt. Local cultures and traditions are not destroyed as local people are allowed to carry on dungeon normally. The flake of people pass on eco holidays are not the same people who go on commercial holidays. This means that in eco areas, they will not get any drug abuse, prostitution or crime. The people who go on eco holidays respect the local peoples shipway of life, try and help the local people and will not try and get in their way.Farmers and people do not lose their land or houses to ecotourism or their traditional way of life as there are not any large companies taking over parts of land or beaches for foreign use only. The local people let tourists into their way of life kind of of adapting to foreign ways. Also the local people and the environment is respected and cared for in ecotourism unlike commercial tourism.The disadvantages of ecotourism are that a lot less money is made from ecotourism than commercial tourism. As a lot less people go on eco holidays the countries get less money, but all the money is going straight to the local people instead of out of the country.Ecotourism does not create as much employment as commercial tourism as it is not on a large scale. It is based around the local people and not always for the tourists benefit. Due to this there are not any attractions or many facilities which in commercial tourism would create a lot of jobs.The people who would be in favour for ecotourism are the Quichua people in Napo who would not want commercial tourism in their area. Here is a quote from the Quichua people about ecotourismOur way of life, traditions a nd culture are being preserved. Some people who left our village to find work are now returning to work in ecotourism. Our community is becoming strongerThey would not want commercial tourism as the hotels, airports, roads and other facilities would spoil the natural environment and ruin their cultures and natural ways of life. They would prefer ecotourism which would invite tourists into the area, generating money for the country without spoiling the natural environment or disturbing their native way of life. The Quichua people earn a living from making souvenirs and farming. With commercial tourism, their farmland would be taken away and their souvenir industries ruined. All the money created would stay in the country and be used directly to improve their way of life.Below are some quotes from people who have been employed and benefited from ecotourism.We work as guides and decide who we invite to our village. We grow food and make handicraft to sell to the touristsThe profits we earn from ecotourism are invested to improve our community, by building schools and a health nerve center for our childrenNow we can make a living preserving the forest and not destroying itThe people who would not be in favour of ecotourism are companies and businesses in Napo and Ecuador. Companies and businesses in Napo would prefer commercial tourism as it brings in more customers. Ecotourism has a lot less tourists entering the country which would not benefit them. Commercial tourism also brings good transport cerebrate such as airports, roads and trains unlike ecotourism. These transport links would create international customers, expanding the business and acquire Ecuadors debt. Ecotourism limits companies expanding by the low number of tourists and transport links.Local hunters and loggers in Napo may also be against ecotourism. This is because ecotourism enforces many rules on local people, preventing any more destruction of the rainforest. Hunters and loggers could be o ut of work and find it very hard to earn a living as they are unskilled in others areas of employment.ConclusionI have looked at Commercial Tourism and Ecotourism for possible tourism solutions in Napo on behalf of the Quichua people. Both have advantages and disadvantages but in my opinion the most important factors are preserving the Quichua culture and traditions, property the Quichua people happy. The advantages of ecotourism are, it protects the peoples traditions and native ways of life, it helps the local people instead of using them, it creates money directly for the native people and is a more respective and friendly type of tourism.Although there are some advantages to Commercial tourism such as more customers, more money and more overseas investment, these things can sometimes be a disadvantage to the native people. Overall I would choose ecotourism for the Napo region as this type of tourism fills the needs of the Quichua people. I would also choose this type of tourism for LEDCs similar to Ecuador.