Jekyll and Hyde Contrast

Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde consists of reputation, good vs. evil and damage control. In other words, Utterson tirelessly clips to prevent his good friend Dr. Jekyll from being dragged into the dread(a) affairs of Mr. Hyde, and Dr. Jekyll goes to the greatest of lengths to prevent his Hyde identity from being discovered, in disposition to avoid anyone knowing of his somewhat questionable scientific work and chastely despicable behavior. Much of the novel is based on the characters reputations and how they have to proceed a good public image, as they are upper house people.The novel takes place in Victorian England and the main characters are every last(predicate) male members of upper class capital of the United Kingdom. Enfield, Utterson, Lanyon and Jekyll are all aware of kindly expectations and the importance of appearance, Jekyll and Hyde shows a contrast of public vs private. Even in the foremost chapter, Enfield is wary of sharing his story of the mysterious door because he loves gossip, as it destroys reputations. In kind, Utterson refrains from informing the police that Jekyll is a close friend of Hydes interest the murder of Sir Danvers Carew.Rather, to maintain his friends reputation and protect his public image, Utterson goes to Jekyll directly to discourse the matter. This issue also arises in the matter of physical appearances, particularly architecture. In the first chapter, we learn that Hydes mysterious dwelling is run down, neglected, and shabby. In contrast, Jekylls interior(a) is passing well kept, majestic, rich, and beautiful. Ironically, we eventually learn that the mysterious door is in fact connected to Jekylls home, it is a back entrance rarely used. Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde is an test of the duality of human nature, this is shown through the fact that Mr. Hyde is in fact Dr. Jekyll the distinction is that Hyde is formed through all the evil characteristics of Jekyll. Uttersons discovery of Jekylls astounding work occurs in t he final examination chapter of the novel. We have already witnessed Hydes powerfully vicious force play and have seen the contrasting kind, gentle, and honorable Dr. Jekyll. In approaching the novels mystery, Utterson never imagines that Hyde and Jekyll are the same man, as he distinguishs it impossible to believe their extremely contrasting behavior.In pursuing his scientific experiments and validating his work, Jekyll claims, man is not truly one, entirely truly two. So, in Jekylls view, every soul contains elements of both good and evil, except one is al way of lifes dominant. In Jekylls case, his good array is dominant, tho he knows there is evil inside of him, but at the end of the countersign his evil side becomes stronger and unstoppable. However, as a respectable member of partnership and an honorable Victorian gentleman, Jekyll cannot fulfill his evil desires. Thus, he works to pay off a way to separate the two parts of his soul and unfreeze his evil character istics.Unfortunately, rather than separating these forces of good and evil, Jekylls potion only allows his unpollutedly evil side to gain strength. Jekyll is in fact a combination of good and evil, but Hyde is only pure evil, so there is never a way to strengthen or separate Jekylls pure goodness. Without counterbalancing his evil identity, Jekyll allows Hyde to grow more and more strong, and eventually take over entirely, perhaps entirely destroying all the pure goodness Jekyll ever had. The book portrays Hyde in comparable an animal short, hairy, and like a troll with gnarled hands and a horrific face.In contrast, Jekyll is expound in the most gentlemanly terms tall, refined, polite and honorable, with long elegant fingers and a handsome appearance. So, perhaps Jekylls experiment reduces his being to its most base form, in which evil runs freely without his reputation as Jekyll being at risk. Jekyll and Hyde are not the only examples of duality in the novel. The city of Lond on is also portrayed in contrasting terms, as both a foggy, dreary, nightmarish place, and a well kept, bustling center of commerce.Indeed, just as men have both positive and negative qualities, so does society. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde contains extremely violent scenes. In each instance, the culprit is Mr. Hyde, and the victim is an innocent. For example, in the first chapter we learn how Mr. Hyde literally trampled a young girl in the thoroughfare and later on we learn that Hyde, unprovoked, mercilessly beat Sir Danvers Carew to death. Even worse, we find at the conclusion of the novel that Hyde thoroughly enjoyed committing this violence, and afterwards felt a rush of excitement and satisfaction.This shows the pure evil Hyde has that was mentioned before. Interestingly, Hydes final victims, when he commits suicide just before Utterson and Poole break into his cabinet, are both himself and Jekyll. In this final act, neither victim is innocent. Clearly, Hyde is bloodguilty of a g reat many crimes, and Jekyll is guilty as he created Hyde, let him run free, and inhabits the same body as the man. Perhaps in this conclusion, Stevenson is suggesting that to those who promote and commit senseless violence, punishment depart come.